International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel. Maternal Health Division, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. National guidelines for diagnosis and management of gestational diabetes mellitus. Adequacy of sample size in health studies. Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW, Klar J, Lwanga SK, Organization WH. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus and pregnancy outcomes in Iranian women. Hossein-Nezhad A, Maghbooli Z, Vassigh AR, Larijani B. Cigarette smoking and risk of gestational diabetes: a systematic review of observational studies. Wendland EM, Pinto ME, Duncan BB, Belizán JM, Schmidt MI. Non-classical risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Med Sci 2015 11:724–735.ĭode MAS de O, dos Santos IS. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus and associated risk factors in Turkish women: the Trabzon GDM Study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2003 62:131–137.Įrem C, Kuzu UB, Deger O, Can G. Prevalence and risk factors for gestational diabetes assessed by universal screening. Diabet Med 2009 26:1099–1104.ĭi Cianni G, Volpe L, Lencioni C, Miccoli R, Cuccuru I, Ghio A, et al. Risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese women: a prospective study of 16,286 pregnant women in China. Yang H, Wei Y, Gao X, Xu X, Fan L, He J, et al. Gestational diabetes in Korea: incidence and risk factors of diabetes in women with previous gestational diabetes. Gestational diabetes: risk factors and recent advances in its genetics and treatment. Gestational diabetes: the need for a common ground. Epidemiology of gestational diabetes mellitus and its association with type 2 diabetes. However, more evaluation in a bigger patient sample is recommended.īen-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Hod M. The DIPSI could be considered as a simple, single, convenient, and economical method of GDM screening. The GDM prevalence in El-Minya city was 8.86% by DIPSI versus 7.43% by IADPSG with high sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. The multiple logistic regression analysis has shown that BMI, urban residency, gestational hypertension, previous history of GDM, gestational hypertension, family history of DM, and the educational level less than secondary school were determined as independent risk factors of GDM. Compared with IADPSG, the sensitivity and specificity of DIPSI were 100 and 98.5%, respectively, while the positive and negative predictive values were 83 and 100%, respectively. Diagnosis of GDM was carried out according to the DIPSI and IADPSG criteria. In the next morning, fasting and 1 h, and 2 h post-75 g oral glucose tolerance test were assessed. There were 700 pregnant women who underwent the 75 g oral glucose tolerance test irrespective of the meal and plasma glucose measurement after 2 h. ObjectiveĪssessment of the prevalence of GDM in El-Minya city, Egypt using the Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group India (DIPSI) in comparison to the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria, and assessment of the risk factors for GDM in this locality. The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has increased dramatically worldwide in the last decades, but unfortunately it was not studied in Egypt.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |